Sign up for our Monthly Highlights newsletter
Don’t miss the roundup of our newest and most distinctive insights
November 21, 2022 | Klein Consultants
During the interview process, recruiters and hiring managers look for evidence of a candidate’s most important skills and abilities. However, in order to determine an employee’s suitability for a particular task or whether or not to promote them, more in-depth evaluations are often required. To reliably and validly measure the dozens of core competencies, an assessment tool must be designed and used on a regular basis.
Workers need core competencies even if they don’t directly relate to their jobs or their daily work. They differ from worker to worker, and even if two workers share the same core competencies (which always occurs), the extent to which each worker makes use of those skills is as unique as the worker himself. Subjectivity and bias complicate the process of evaluating essential skills. The quality of the evaluations will vary greatly unless they are all conducted by the same evaluator or unless the employer mandates that all evaluators use the same metrics.
Management consultants Edward Cripe and Richard Mansfield wrote a book in 2001 called “The Value-Added Employee: 31 Competencies to Make Yourself Irresistible to Any Company” for workers who wanted to learn how to improve their skills and contributions to employers. Business savvy, self-awareness, and interpersonal skills were identified as the three categories of core competencies by Cripe and Mansfield. Those three main categories are further subdivided into smaller categories, or “clusters,” for short. Skills in problem-solving and problem-prevention are two examples of what we mean when we talk about business competencies. Core competencies involving people and resolving conflicts are distinct from this. Including all three forms of core competencies as well as their respective clusters is essential for creating a valid assessment of those skills.
A person’s skills and abilities can be gauged through a competency assessment. Competency assessments are a useful tool for pinpointing an individual’s strengths and developing areas of growth. Employee performance and output can both benefit from this method.
In order to evaluate an individual, it is necessary to define the process to be used, the competencies to be evaluated, and the people who will perform the evaluation. The assessor can make use of a form to keep track of relevant information as part of this procedure.
The value of conducting an employee competency evaluation cannot be overstated.
Evaluations of workers’ core competencies are used to pinpoint areas of improvement in the workplace. Regular competency assessments are a good way to make sure your staff has the most up-to-date knowledge and abilities they need to do their jobs.
Companies can benefit from competency assessments in a number of ways, including:
For the purpose of evaluating a worker’s skill sets, a competency assessment template can be useful. The competency, the assessor, and the assessment procedure can all be determined with the help of the provided template.
Assessors can better carry out and document the assessment with the aid of a competency assessment tool. In addition, you can use this sample as a basis for developing an individual assessment of an employee’s skills and abilities.
The first step in developing a competency evaluation form for use with employees is to make a list of the skills and abilities that will be evaluated. The position and company culture will determine which skills and knowledge are most relevant.
These are some examples of invaluable competency skills:
Data mining, analysis, and problem-solving oriented thought processes are crucial in the realm of core competencies for businesses. These skills belong to the problem-solving subcategory. The rate of employee turnover is a useful metric for gauging the effectiveness of human resources departments and, more specifically, the HR managers responsible for setting the tone for recruitment and retention initiatives. In terms of qualitative metrics, you could look at things like employee retention rates and levels of job satisfaction as discussed in focus groups.
Time management, personal and professional ethics, self-confidence, and motivation are all essential components of self-awareness. Some examples of qualitative criteria are how well an employee adapts to new situations and how much respect they show to their superiors and peers. Quantitatively evaluating HR professionals might involve looking at how many employee relations complaints were handled internally rather than referred to federal agencies like the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or resulted in litigation.
Core competencies that affect an employee’s interactions with others include communication skills, the capacity to cultivate productive relationships with peers, managers, and colleagues, and the ability to resolve conflicts and negotiate agreements. An efficient method of measuring an employee’s performance in this area is to combine assessment models for business competencies and self-awareness competencies. Due to the necessity of including the opinions of others in the evaluation of one’s interpersonal core competencies, this type of evaluation is arguably the most open to interpretation.